Radial Engineering ProMS2 Passive Microphone Splitter

This did the trick. I needed to split a single mic and send it a two separate isolated sources. Working perfectly as advertised and well constructed.

I got this and a similar device made by ART. Nothing wrong with the Radial, but there’s nothing wrong with the ART either, and I paid only $16 for it from Amazon. Somebody had returned it. I think they usually cost closer to $50.I’m sure if you care about ridiculous fidelity at the high end, the radial is probably measurably better, but if you care that much, then you should probably pay the extra $100 for the even better transformer in the even higher-end radial model. … I guess what I’m saying is, if you really care about sound, skip this and get the better one, and if your ears aren’t super human, skip this and get the cheaper transformer splitter. Note: ART also makes a splitter that doesn’t use transformer. Avoid that one.If I had to do it again, not needing that crazy fidelity, I would skip the Radial and save the money.I guess the only other thing to note is that the enclosure of this radial is bigger, stronger,And probably better built, but That’s not necessarily an advantage for my delicate, small home studio use.

I'm sure that Radial ProMS2 is good, but they just sent me another product, Radial Catapult Mini TX...

I love all Radial products I've used so far (passive and active DI's, splitters, BT-Pro, and a few others) because they're clean, built like tanks, and reliable. The ProMS2 is no exception. It is very much worth the extra cost (compared to cheaper, bare bones DI boxes).

Very well made and versatile mic splitter. The unit has two outputs allowing you to send the mic signal to two different inputs, such as a PA and a separate recorder at the same time, which is very convenient and useful.

Anything Radial makes is just great!

A nice piece of gear, unfortunately my friend, a sales rep, told me he would have sold it to me for half the price.

Top notch