sinocareCGM Sensor Covers, Waterproof, Continuous Glucose Monitor Protection, a Pack of 10 Pieces

I am a nurse and have been using CGMs to monitor for hypoglycemia and was interested in Sinocare as a more affordable option for myself. Unfortunately, I found the ICAN extremely unreliable and to confirm this I stimulated a Mixed Meal Postprandial Hypoglycemia Test whilst simultaneously wearing two different CGM types - ICAN and Dexcom for comparison [this involved fasting from 10pm, then drinking ensure at 9am, with an additional blood glucose taken every 30 minutes over a 5 hour period from 9am-3pm during which only water allowed]. I compared the readings from blood glucose finger prick (sinocare gold AQ meter), ICAN and Dexcom in a graph. The Dexcom and the fingerstick were very closely aligned between 4-6mmol throughout, however, the ICAN was consistently above this range giving readings with a difference as big as 2.6mmol e.g. when my meter read 4.5 and the ICAN seemed to think I was 7.1 despite levels being stable without rapid changes [note: it is not expected to be identical as there is a lag between blood glucose and interstitial glucose, but the trends will still correlate and the readings should be fairly close together when levels are stable which was the case here]. Additionally, the ICAN doesn't allow for self calibration which could have resolved this issue and not having this option makes the device more unreliable. The company states that "calibration is not required because it is calibrated in the factory", however, many medical devices require regular calibration and worth noting that self calibration is possible with other CGM's brands on the market. Advise you save your time, money, and more importantly, your health, as the cost of a mistake in blood glucose readings is far too dangerous. The positive reviews I read on amazon appear to be from those who did not compare readings to a glucose meter. The app does have a nice layout, though this is somewhat irrelevant given the poor quality of the data.

Update. After used 3 sensors.+ve. Now much easier to apply than first. I think the lock had not disengaged or I had not turned it enough.-ve. Subsequent sensors have had an offset when compared to finger prick tests. Suspect location of sensor has an effect and obviosuly no way to move once on. You can adjust the low alarm value to stop the nuisance alarms but I think App could really do with ability to apply an offset.+ve. Using it to monitor affect of diet and exercise I have successfully prevented having to start diabetes treatment.Overall good value..So far been using for a week with Android App.Accurate compared to finger prick tests right from the start. Remember that CGM typically lag finger prick tests by 10-20 mins.Better value than competitors, especially if you plan ahead and can allow long delivery.Global support replied to emails within 24 hours with helpful information.App works fine with one limitation.You cannot export/save the data via History_Report for the current sensor. After contacting support thinking I was doing something wrong they mentioned following feedback they are looking at adding this. In interim I take screen pics of the graphs if I need to create a report.App does not drain battery excessively.The iCan Reach app on a second mobile phone worked fine for real time monitoring/alarms..The use of CGM has been quite eye opening. After adjusting diet and exercise timing I've already stopped the high spikes and lowered average value. Time will tell if I manage to keep it up and how it affects the HbA1c blood tests.

This is a blood sugar monitor with an Android or iOS App which automatically takes blood sugar measurements every two or three minutes.It’s similar to a well-known monitor which is available on NHS Prescription and so is free of charge throughout the UK with the exception of England where normal prescription charges will apply. The monitor is readily available to Type 1 and 3C diabetics. So if you have that type of diabetes you should speak to your GP before purchasing this product. If you have Type 2 this product might be worth investing in. However, you’ll need to pay around £105 a month for a supply of monitors. I’d certainly recommend as a one-off test to see if you have significant BS variation which might justify ongoing monitoring.The monitor and app work as expected. It can be positioned on the arm or stomach - whereas for the NHS-supplied monitor should be applied to the arm only. The iCan monitor is probably more secure when attached to the stomach and easier to disguise. There’s more risk of knocking a monitor attached to the arm. Other differences are minor. The monitor takes two hours once attached before supplying blood sugar results whereas it’s only an hour for the NHS kit. The iCan lasts for 15 days, after which it will stop providing readings. The NHS device lasts for only 14 days.For diabetics wanting a better grasp of blood sugar levels this sort of technology is a game changer. It means no more finger prick tests except where reported BS rates look highly abnormal. The constant readings give a far better of how BS varies over time, something not possible via finger pricks.So I recommend the technology for all diabetics. This device works as expected, and in a very similar way to an NHS-supplied monitor. I’d compare prices and support with the market leader before deciding to go with the iCan.A strong four stars.

This product was so wrong..I'm talking the difference between 9.1-12.1 readings. If it was always 3 out I could get on board with it but it was wrong the other way this morning. So I did a manual reading the cgm was showing less even though it's been constantly showing majorly higher. It just is really unreliable and considering it's people's health were measuring I don't think it should be that incorrect.