TargusUSB-C Male to USB-C Male Cable with Screw and USB-A Tether, 1M Length for Secure and Reliable Connectivity, Compact Design for Travel (ACC1133GLX)

There was nothing about this product I didn’t like. I can’t rate the “Durability,” of this product as I haven’t had it that long. But for purposes of charging or data transfer it works excellently.

Hard to write a review on cords. These do exactly as they should! They charge quickly and safely without overheating your device.

(Disclaimer: this is the SAME EXACT cable as the Naztech, except the Naztech has better connectors and is cheaper. I'd recommend the Naztech over this. Same criticisms apply.) Naztech USB-C to USB-C Cable, Certified USB 3.1 SuperSpeed+ Supports 10Gbps Data Transfer & 100W/5A Power Delivery! 3ft. Compatible with all USB Type-C devices (New Macbook) This is Nathan K, a Google Top Contributor program volunteer (Nexus/Pixel Support Forums), and follower of Benson Leung doing independent USB-C verification and testing. I analyzed Targus's "USB3.1 Type-C to Type-C Cable Assembly Gen2 1M 5A" [Model ACC927USX].This cable claims to be a USB-IF Certified rebrand of CE LINK's U3-CC-5A1M C01000-00413. Yet it has major errors that suggests it does NOT comply with the USB Type-C specification version 1.2. This is a paradox. However, since I have encountered bad "USB-IF Certified" cords before (like the j5Create JUCX03), I have to conclude this Targus is noncompliant -- but safe.THE GOOD: This cable claims to be USB-IF certified on the packaging, and in advertisements. The cables have individual "Lot number" stickers on the cable itself. The connenctors are plain. Upon inspecting the eMarker it is properly rated for 5A/100W. This cable passed SI and DCR tests on a Total Phase Advanced Cable Tester Level 2.THE BAD: Upon manual inspection of the eMarker fields, there are silly errors. The Product ID is blank. The CertStat (certification) field is blank. The Vconn field claims "Vconn (always) required" insted of "for Identification only". HW and FW fields are blank. The IR drop is comparable to 3A OEM cords, but still within 5A limits. Per-pin resistance is high.WHAT IT MEANS: As I cited with the Plugable cable, a PID of Zero will only become a problem if CE LINK make *any other* product with a PID of 0. The CertStat field being blank means some devices/peripherals may refuse to work with this cable since it is "not certified". Vconn being labeled as required means it will "waste" 25mW of battery power continuously.IN CONCLUSION: I'd advise against the Targus cable. It has mistakes compared to USB-IF Certified cables like the j5Create JUCX01, which I link below as the "gold standard". USB 3.1 Type-C to Type-C Coaxial Cable JUCX01 Data was sampled with a TotalPhase Advanced Cable Tester Level 2 and Plugable/Google Twinkie in combination with my own custom-made microcontrollers and equipment. Additional data may be verified by using Plus. Plugable USB 3.1 Type-C (USB-C) Power Delivery Sniffer

The picture and model number are for the genuine ACC927USX USB C to USB C cable. However, some sellers are sending various other Targus cables instead, such as the ACC925USX, which is a Micro B to USB C cable. Which is essentially useless unless you're trying to connect an old hard drive to a very new laptop.This is most likely the correct cable, with the correct picture, and correct description:https://www.amazon.com/Targus-USB-Data-Transfer-Cable/dp/B01LZPL6U9/But I'll probably order direct from Targus instead of rolling the dice again.