DSLR Camera [EOS 90D] with Built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, DIGIC 8 Image Processor, 4K Video, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, and 3.0 Inch Vari-Angle Touch LCD Screen, [Body Only], Black

This might be the camera I have been waiting from Canon for some time now, however the verdict is still out. INTRODUCTION I have been into amateur photography since the film days and once I got into digital photography I was a Canon shooter until 2017 when I discovered Pentax K-1. I have also used mirrorless like Olympus E-M10 Mark II, Panasonic Lumix G9, Fuji X-T100 and Canon M50. Since I started shooting with Pentax I pretty much abandoned all my Canon gear, including 5D Mark II, however I kept using Canon 70D mainly for air shows, nature and lately for birding as well as movie shooting. I got more into birding lately and I was looking for a good alternative to a DSLR for this purpose. Tried Panasonic G9 with 100-400mm lens but it was not a match to Canon 70D and Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary. I really got a great copy that is tack sharp wide open at 600mm. This lens alone and 100-400L trombone was what was keeping me from dumping Canon for good. Since I have been looking for something to upgrade my 70D for birding and air shows, I will be reviewing this camera mostly from this point of view. FIRST IMPRESSIONS The build is very similar to 70D. The major difference I noticed the most is the grip, which is protruding more and it is more comfortable to hold the camera with a big zoom lens. For people with smaller hands it might be somewhat of an adjustment but it fits me just right. Other than the grip, the joystick and few buttons placed slightly differently, it feels really like the same camera. The menus changed slightly but it took me no time to set it up pretty much same way I had 70D set up. SHOOTING PERFORMANCE I just received it today (9/12/2019) and went outside to shoot some comparison hand held shots with my Sigma 150-600mm. Since it was late the light was getting more and more challenging. Stationary subject for now and auto ISO max 3,200 on both 90D and 70D with 6.3 aperture. First thing I noticed was a difference in the shutter sound and I must say I like it much more than the one of 70D. It is more subtle yet sounds pretty assuring. I know this is more intangible quality but I like it. Never paid too much attention to this until 90D. The second thing that stood out was that 90D was suggesting slightly different shutter speed at the same auto ISO and aperture. 90D would also sometimes pick slightly different auto ISO as well. In general the numbers looked like 90D is slightly more sensitive than 70D. Have not had a chance to test tracking yet but I tried burst RAW only shooting and with Lexar Professional 1667x 128GB SDXC UHS-II at the maximum 10 frames per second rate the buffer filled up in 3 seconds. At 3 frames per second rate (slow burst mode) the buffer filled up after 19 seconds. After that it became very random, from 1 per second to 4 per second frame rate. In more realistic bird shooting simulation when I usually shoot 4-7 frames and take a second or so of brake between bursts, it took almost a minute or so for the buffer to start slowing the shooting down. OCTOBER 2019 UPDATE: Went out birding several times and in real time shooting situation I think the buffer only slowed me down once over several days. This is really good considering this thing does 10fps. So far so good. I also tried some BIF of hawks and eagles flying around and I must say that the viewfinder performance in tracking mode seems much better than 70D. This all with my Sigma 150-600MM C. Soon the air show will come to town and I will give 90D run through with my Canon trombone 100-400L. AIRSHOW UPDATE: Went to airshow with Canon 100-400L trombone and results are what I was waiting for. Previously I shot airshows mainly with my Canon 5D Mark II as somehow the quality was better than 70D. Now I can leave 5D behind and just use 90D from now on. Autofocus performance in AFC mode was spot on and out of thousands of photos maybe few were not completely up to snuff. I also attached some samples from the shoot. PICTURE QUALITY With the limited time I had to test so far I must say that the sharpness is there and the extra pixels make quite a difference. I did some comparison shots between 70D and 90D and must say that at the same zoom there is much more sharpness to photos. Colors seem identical so far. I usually use DxO to process photos but 90D profile is not yet available for DxO yet so I only used Canon's DPP. The noise level at 3,200 ISO seems more pleasing on 90D than 70D. I was looking for something with more resolution to shoot birds in case I need to crop. My full frame Pentax has pixels but there is no lens that could compete with the reach of Sigma 150-600mm on the crop sensor. I will post updates as I do more testing. Over next couple of weeks I will be doing more testing of actual birds and maybe some challenging birds in flight. I will also try some 4k videos. I will also try testing some macro photography, including macro focus stacking as 90D has the macro bracketing function built in (although only in Live View shooting mode). OCTOBER 2019 UPDATE: Went out birding several times and the resolution bump makes a big difference. Much less cropping penalty, gets me closer to those smaller birds. Picture quality very good and in focus hit ratio very good also. I took my old 70D to do some comparisons with but I failed at that because as soon as I started to shoot birds with 90D I never put it away. It was that much of a difference. Photos attached to this review are only processed with Canon DPP. CONCLUSIONS It is too early to tell just yet but this seems to be shaping up to be what I was looking for birding, nature and macro photography. It may also become my travel camera as well since it is not very heavy and with two EF-S lenses it does not take that much space in the backpack. OCTOBER 2019 UPDATE: As of now only Canon DPP recognizes RAW images (had to be upgraded) but I suppose this will change soon enough. This is okay for now but I hope DxO Photo Lab will add it to their camera lineup soon. Still happy with the camera. Big upgrade from 70D for birding. LATEST UPDATE: DxO has the profiles now and they work great. Battery life is improved with the slightly more capacity of new LP-E6N. Old LP-E6 batteries also work just fine and the number of photos on one battery charge depends on how you shoot. For example, at the air show I shot almost 3.5k photos, most in bursts at 10fps and the new battery lasted me for all of them. You need to carry spare, because you will forget there is even battery there and eventually you will run out, usually when least expected ;-). The multi controller (aka joystick) is very useful and welcomed addition. Low light performance is improved over 70D but not by much. However, considering that this is 32.5 megapixel APS-C it is not very surprising. In Canon world it is an equivalent of 86 megapixel full frame, which by the way does not exist. Therefore, expecting low light performance of full frame cameras would be like expecting technological miracle. For low light birding I use Pentax KP crop camera but that one is 24 megapixels. Cropping is double edged sword. If the subject is close enough but small, then cropping helps a lot and produces amazing results. However, when subject is pretty far away, cropping might be detrimental to the photo quality due to atmospheric conditions but that is just physics. Just wanted to mention this so no one expects miracles. Still keeping the camera, even after briefly considering putting pre-order on Canon R5. However, for birding and air shows with the current lenses available (at reasonable prices) full frame will not work for me as well as 90D does.

This camera is great. 32 Mp sensor is crystal clear for any cropping. It has all the right buttons in the right place to include AF-On to be mapped to your autofocus which makes recomposing focus a breeze. The touch screen is a new thing for me but greatly appreciated. This camera swings pretty high above its price range!

The features are amazing. The company that I bought this from delivered the product on 2-day shipping. I bought it on Monday, it arrived promptly and safely on Wednesday. They packaged it sufficiently so it wouldn’t get damaged during shipping, and the camera was spotless and performs exactly as expected from such a high quality product, the shutter is responsive and quiet, AF is snippy and quick, and the aperture is accurate. 10/10 would rec. this camera to those with the scratch to afford it.

This camera is absolutely everything and more! Fast processor, super clear and crisp photos/videos, and no matter what lens you use it's going to shine! Currently, I have50mm, 35mm, and 24mm (I think) - and all of them paired with this camera are impeccable! I sold my Canon SL2 the same day I received this because it definitely costs a pretty penny. But for the quality, functionality, ease of use, and I wouldn't go back for anything! This camera is also evenly weighted and I recommend a mini tripod if you intend to vlog with it. Overall, just a phenomenal investment from any older Canon model.

I have only had this camera for 24 hours so this review reflects very limited initial testing but here are my initial observations. This camera replaces a Canon 7d Mark 2 that is close to 10 years old. This is my first DSLR with built in HDR. Based on a few images this morning I’m happy with this function and look forward to using it on vacation which will significantly reduce my post processing time. However, be aware that it takes a few seconds to process HDR images and you won’t be able to take another photo until it is complete. It seems to have the same customization features as my 7d such as back button focusing which I utilize all the time. My initial photos looked fine, but I’m not a pro scrutinizing every detail. I also transferred photos to my phone using Canon Connect’s Bluetooth function. It was easy to setup and execute the transfer. I have two minor complaints about the camera. The first and most significant is the quick control dial on the back of the camera used to adjust aperture is too small and difficult to turn. The 7d has a prominent dial that is very easy to turn without looking at it. On the 90d it is too flush with the back of the camera. I literally need to look at it and dig my fingernail into it to turn it. Major miss on this part by Canon to save a few pennies. My only other complaint is that Canon should be ashamed of the user manual they send in the box. It is worthless. I was able to figure out how to use the camera because I’m familiar with Canon DSLRs, but anyone new to Canon or DSLRs should download the advanced manual from the Canon website or purchase one of the books that provide instruction on this camera. Overall, this camera provides a lot of functionality for $1,000 and I recommend it for amateur photographers.

I replaced my venerable (10 year old) EOS 60D with this. I have not yet shot video with it, but regarding the stills: 1) they are of higher resolution (in pixels at least) 2) the (4X?) increase in ISO rating is great for poorly-lit available light photography without a flash (nice for candid work) 3) the shutter is significantly tighter and quieter (nice for candid work) 4) the viewfinder indicators are much improved (black LCD enhancements in light conditions, red (lit) LCD enhancements in the dark) 5) my old Canon glass (lenses) all work perfectly All in all, I'm quite happy with my upgrade. Given my age, it'll probably be my last *real* camera (no mirrorless for me (I love a glass viewfinder) and I don't count a smart phone as a real camera).

I bought this camera to replace my Canon EOS 80D after I dropped it in a river. I loved my 80D and had all of the lenses, so I just got the upgraded version because I needed a camera asap. I didn’t have time to do research on other options since I had a trip planned for the next week when my 80D drowned. There was absolutely no learning curve for me coming from the 80D, which I appreciated. Since this is a DSLR, it does have some weight to it. It handles pretty well in low light conditions for a DSLR (much better than the 80D did). Also, the megapixels are impressive for a DSLR at 32.5 megapixels, which is great for my wildlife photography (I can crop in a good amount without issue). The biggest issue I have with the camera is that the WiFi connection is iffy. There are times where I cannot get it to connect to my phone for the life of me when I want to use my phone to remote shoot. I had the same issue with the 80D, and I had hoped it wouldn’t be an issue with the 90D. Not a deal breaker, just annoying. I’ve been using this camera since June of 2023 as a travel blogger and food blogger and just for day to day photography. It has been serving me well and as of right now, I don’t have any plans to get rid of it. I appreciate that I can turn the ISO up fairly high indoors without making an image unusable (which was not the case with the 80D).

I use my DSLRs almost exclusively for nature photography (mostly bird photography) with a 300mm Canon IS f/4 lens attached. In purchasing the 90D, I was stepping up from a Canon 70D (20MP) for the extra sharpness and the ability to crop without as much loss of resolution. I got what I was seeking, but not before undergoing some transitional issues. It never occurred to me that my first DSLR - a Canon 20D (8 MP) - and my new Canon 90D (32MP) , had the same size sensor. That means that the 90D's pixels are packed tighter and are SMALLER. Is there a downside to those smaller pixels? According to some experts --- yes. There is greater difficulty in getting a sharp image with smaller pixels. In fact, my early efforts with the 90D were somewhat disappointing. I had always shot using the "P" setting - I set the ISO, and the camera set the shutter speed and aperture. I've found that the key to sharp shots with the 90D and a big, heavy telephoto (which is often handheld) is HIGH SHUTTER SPEED. You'll find videos on the WEB about this, but I have now switched to using the "M" setting. I set the shutter speed (if sufficient light I try for at least 1/2000) and the f/stop (preferably f8, but may settle for as low as f5 if light is a problem), and then set the ISO to "A" (automatic). Thus, I control shutter speed and aperture but let the camera pick the ISO. In low light, I have to compromise my variables, but even so the ISO may go to as high as 6400 in really low light. That's not good, but if I insisted on a lower ISO setting, I might have missed the image entirely (gotten a blurred image from long shutter speed). It's been a change of philosophy, but using that system, the 90D has been giving me great images of incredible sharpness. If you do regular short lens photography you won't have some of these problems. Either way, it's a great body, but be aware of the "small pixel" issue when hand holding the camera and lens.

satıcı ilgili ve hızlı makina da çok güzel çok memnun kaldım amazondan alışverişi tavsiye ediyorum herkese

Boas condições

As described

Es una muy buena camara Reflex, uso mucho el formato APS-C por la magnificacion, compre adicional a mis lentes un lente de motor nano y estabilizador de imagen, de alta apertura, (1.8) por lo que las imágenes son brillantes y de extraordinaria calidad sin tener que gastar mas de cuatro veces en una R5, no tendrá todo pero tiene mas de lo que yo necesito

Originally had a T6 that I started out with a couple years ago. Thought it was finally time to upgrade. The camera is awesome. The images are crisp (compared to a t6). It’s bulkier and the features are a lot of fun to play with. The package also arrived a few days before the expected due date so I had the weekend to play with it. The only weird thing is that I bought the body only but it arrived in the box that would have included the lens. So that means the box was opened and separated. Everything else looked sealed tho and I’m overall very happy with my purchase.